Legal Opinion
United States v. Foster
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 24, 1941No. 9670PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GARRECHT, Circuit Judge.
The appellant, plaintiff below, brought an action against Emma G. Foster to recover damages for an alleged conversion of ten *33head of cattle. The complaint alleged that Harvey Hopper and Mabel Hopper, his wife, as mortgagors, had executed and delivered to the plaintiff, as mortgagee, on April 29, 1938, a chattel mortgage covering crops, certain described farming equipment, and certain described livestock, located on premises occupied by the Hoppers, also described; that the livestock described included ten head of cattle, named and identified; that the debt secured by…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Seaboard Acceptance Corp. v. ShayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Western MacHinery Co. v. GraetzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Seaboard Dairy Credit Corp. v. EricksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1930
- Wheeler v. KranerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
3Cited by11 opinions
- Glens Falls Indemnity Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- Fox v. Summit King Mines, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944
- Frank A. Calhoun, Individually and Dba Calhoun Dry-Wall Company v. J. W. BernardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Paramount Pest Control Service v. BrewerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- Glens Falls Indemnity Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.