Pitzer College v. Indian Harbor Ins. Co.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtOpinion of the Court by Chin, J.
**671 *97 California's notice-prejudice rule generally allows insureds to proceed with their insurance policy claims even if they give their insurer late notice of a claim, provided that the late notice does not substantially prejudice the insurer. ( Campbell v. Allstate Ins. Co. (1963) 60 Cal.2d 303 , 307, 32 Cal.Rptr. 827 , 384 P.2d 155 ( Campbell ).) In this context, we consider two narrow questions from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, restated as follows: (1) Is California's common law notice-prejudice rule a fundamental public policy for the purpose of choice of…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Egan v. Mutual of Omaha InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Clemmer v. Hartford Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
- Wash. Mut. Bank v. Superior Court of Orange Cty.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Nedlloyd Lines B v. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Admiral InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Airs Aromatics, LLC v. CBL Data Recovery Tech. Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2020
- Carbon Crest LLC v. Tencue Productions, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022
- Gonzalez v. Hoovestol Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2024
- Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. v. Twin City Fire Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2022
- In re American Bankers Insurance Company of FloridaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.