People v. Quezada
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject defendant’s claim that the application for an eavesdropping warrant failed to contain an adequate statement of facts establishing that ordinary investigative procedures had been, or would be, unsuccessful (see, CPL 700.20 [2] [d]). The affidavit of Lt. Frank Sardino, the supervising officer of drug-related investigations and a 21-year veteran of the police department, contained a detailed description of the five-month investigation leading up *951to the application. This description revealed that an undercover officer had purchased cocaine…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. TuttNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- People v. BarisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- People v. RomneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- People v. BavisottoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- People v. HoppeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. FonvilleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- People v. MercedesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- People v. BachillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- People v. StephensAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- People v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.