Legal Opinion
Stephens v. Costello
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided April 29, 1999No. 6:96-cv-06218PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
FELDMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
Preliminary Statement
Petitioner Titus Stephens (hereinafter “Stephens”), proceeding pro se, petitions this Court for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), the parties have consented to the disposition of this matter by the undersigned. For the reasons set forth below, Stephens’ petition for a writ of habeas corpus is denied.
Factual Background
On August 10, 1993, following a jury trial in Ontario County Court, Stephens was found guilty of Criminal Sale of a Controlled Substance in the Third…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Morris v. SlappySupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- People v. RosarioNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
- United States v. William BentvenaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Oquendo v. SenkowskiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Giraldi v. BartlettDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Linnen v. PooleDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2011
- Linnen v. PooleDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2010
- Rafael Flores v. Joseph Demskie, Superintendent of Woodbourne Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.