Legal Opinion
Randall v. Potter
District Court, D. Maine
Decided February 9, 2005No. CV-03-135-B-WPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE
WOODCOCK, District Judge.
With her Response in Opposition to the Postal Service’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, Plaintiff Linda L. Randall filed a Motion to Strike fifteen of Defendant Postal Service’s Statement of Undisputed Facts Including Material Facts. Ms. Randall’s objections are not well founded and this Court DENIES her motion in its entirety. 1
1. DISCUSSION
A. Ms. Randall’s Failure to Comply With Local Rules 7 and 56
Responding to the Postal Service’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, Ms. Randall filed a Motion to Strike Defendant’s…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- United States v. BoylanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Adolph G. Hoffman v. C. H. Halden, Dr. Donald E. Wair, Dr. G. F. Keller and Dr. F. Sydney HansenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Halkett v. CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, INC.District Court, D. Maine · 2011
- F.E.R.C. v. SilkmanDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2019
- Gammon v. CRISIS AND COUNSELING CENTERS, INC.District Court, D. Maine · 2011