Legal Opinion

Schulte v. Fitch

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 27, 1925No. 24,578PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Taylor, C.

Chapter 269, p. 350, L. 1923, provides, in section 1:

“The boards of county commissioners of the several counties of this state are hereby authorized upon petition of a majority of the persons owning cattle in the county * * * to appropriate * * * a sum of money not exceeding twenty-five cents per head of cattle for each tuberculin test that may be administered, until the percentage of tuberculous cattle within the county is reduced to meet the requirements of a ‘modified accredited area’ as defined and approved by the United States Department of Agriculture and the State Live Stock…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Blue v. BeachIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  2. State ex rel. Douglas v. WestfallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
  3. State ex rel. Young v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  4. Williams v. EvansSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  5. Davock v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1895

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Loftus v. Department of Agriculture of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  2. Patrick v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Fevold v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  4. Quesenberry v. EstepWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1956
  5. The People v. AndersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1934

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API