Legal Opinion

Williams v. Evans

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 21, 1917No. Nos. 19,166, 19,167PublishedCited by 49 opinions

Two actions in the district court for Ramsey county. The Williams action was by a taxpayer on his own behalf and on behalf of other taxpayers similarly situated. The Earner action was by the owner of a manufacturing plant at which a large number of women workers, adult and minor, were employed.

Read the full summary

Two actions in the district court for Ramsey county. The Williams action was by a taxpayer on his own behalf and on behalf of other taxpayers similarly situated. The Earner action was by the owner of a manufacturing plant at which a large number of women workers, adult and minor, were employed. Both actions were to restrain the members of the Minimum Wage Commission from expending any money in furtherance of the provisions of Laws 1913, p. 789, c. 547, and to restrain defendant Iverson, as state auditor, from auditing any claims incurred by the commission on account of anything done under the…

1Opinion of the CourtHallam, J.

The legislature of Minnesota in 1913 passed an act (Laws 1913, p. 789, c. 547 (G. S. 1913, § 3904), establishing a Minimum Wage Commission and providing for the determination and establishment of minimum wages for women 'and minors.

This act defines a living wage as a wage “sufficient to maintain the worker in health and supply him with the necessary comforts and conditions of reasonable life.” “Minimum wage” is given the same meaning. Section 20 (G. S. 1913, § 3923).

The act prohibits every employer in any occupation “from employing any worker at less than the living wage or minimum wage as…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Lochner v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Field v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Barbier v. ConnollySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Wayman v. SouthardSupreme Court of the United States · 1825
  5. United States v. GrimaudSupreme Court of the United States · 1911

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Dybdal v. State Securities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  2. Anderson v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  3. Associated Industries of Oklahoma v. Industrial Welfare CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  4. Gibson Products Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  5. State Ex Rel. Cleveringa v. KleinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API