Legal Opinion

The People v. Anderson

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1934No. 22222. Judgment affirmedPublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Herrick

An amended information was filed in the county court of Henderson county which charged the plaintiff in error, Carl Anderson, (hereinafter called the defendant,) with the violation of section 2 of the Bovine Tuberculosis Eradication act.of June 25, 1929, hereinafter referred to as the Tuberculosis act. (Smith’s Stat. 1933, chap. 8, par. 88, p. 146; Cahill’s Stat. 1933, chap. 8, par. 75, p. 113.) So far as material to the issues here, section 2 of the act is as follows: "All owners of dairy or breeding cattle within the State of Illinois shall submit their cattle for a tuberculin test upon…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Terrace v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Powell v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. Illinois ex rel. Drainage CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  4. North American Cold Storage Co. v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  5. Gundling v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1900

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. People v. GilliamIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Wintersteen v. National Cooperage & Woodenware Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Fenske Bros. v. Upholsterers International Union of North America, Local No. 18Illinois Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Johnson v. PearceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
  5. City of Decatur v. ChasteenIllinois Supreme Court · 1960

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API