Legal Opinion

Davock v. Moore

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 1895PublishedCited by 44 opinions

Certiorari to Wayne. (Hosmer, J.) Relators applied to the circuit court for mandamus to compel respondent to issue his warrant for the payment of a check issued by the board of health, and respondent brings certiorari to review order granting the writ. The facts are stated in the majority opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

At the present session the Legislature passed an act entitled “An act to establish a board of health for the city of Detroit.” 1 The act was approved by the Governor February 27, 1895, and took immediate effect. Under that act the board is to consist of four members, electors and freeholders in the city of Detroit, to be appointed by the Governor, by. and with the advice and consent of the Senate. The members of the board of health so appointed at once entered upon their duties as a board of health. This act repealed all former acts providing for a board of health in the city of Detroit, and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Drake v. MahaneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Beer Co. v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. People ex rel. Le Roy v. HurlbutMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  4. People ex rel. Board of Park Commissioners v. Common CouncilMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  5. People v. HanrahanMichigan Supreme Court · 1889

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. State ex rel. White v. BarkerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  2. Standard Chemical & Oil Co. v. City of TroySupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  3. Attorney General ex rel. Moreland v. Common CouncilMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  4. City of Huntington v. State Water CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1953
  5. City of Birmingham v. Hood-Mcpherson Realty Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1937

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API