Legal Opinion
Martin v. Colonial Ins. Co. of California
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided September 30, 1986No. Civ. A. 85-486-JRRPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROTH, District Judge.
The plaintiff Bernis Martin has brought suit against Colonial Insurance Company of California (Colonial), seeking a declaratory judgment and damages against the defendant. The plaintiff is claiming the defendant insurance company has an obligation to pay his damages under the Personal Injury Protection (PIP) coverage in his automobile insurance policy. This Court has jurisdiction based upon complete diversity.
Defendant Colonial has moved for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. Colonial argues that two provisions in the policy expressly exclude coverage for the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Toebelman v. Missouri-Kansas Pipe Line Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
- Farm Bureau Mutual Automobile Insurance v. MarrDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1955
- Nathan Miller, Inc. v. Northern InsuranceSuperior Court of Delaware · 1944
- Home Insurance Company v. KennedySuperior Court of Delaware · 1959
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Potesta v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
- Corso v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1987
- United States v. Milwaukee Guardian Insurance Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- Arclight Capital Partners, LLC v. Freepoint Commodities LLCSuperior Court of Delaware · 2026
- Colonial Ins. Co. of California v. JermannOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.