Nathan Miller, Inc. v. Northern Insurance
Superior Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Layton, Chief Justice:
*526The plaintiff sued upon an insurance policy ■ indemnifying it against damage through sprinkler leakage, by the terms of which policy formal proof of loss was required to be rendered within sixty days. Proof of loss was not filed within the stipulated time, but the plaintiff, in excuse, alleged waiver and estoppel. The defendant demurred generally.
The fifth count of the declaration, based on waiver, and all of the counts, based on estoppel, were conceded to be defective in substance and require no consideration. The remaining counts, based on waiver, did not allege the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Baird v. Fidelity-Phenix Fire Ins. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1942
- Reynolds v. Travelers Insurance Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1934
- John Alt Furniture Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937
- Webster v. State Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1908
- North British & Mercantile Ins. v. Luck's Strike Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Aeroglobal Capital Management, LLC v. Cirrus Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2005
- Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co. of Asbury Park v. Pepsico, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1972
- Great American Insurance v. General Insurance Co. of AmericaOregon Supreme Court · 1970
- Richard Parsons v. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2016
- Pullman, Incorporated v. Phoenix Steel CorporationSuperior Court of Delaware · 1973
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.