Legal Opinion
Corso v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided August 13, 1987No. Civ. A. 86-312-JLLPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
LATCHUM, Senior District Judge.
1. INTRODUCTION
Once again, this Court must venture into the morass of Delaware uninsured motorist law and resolve a previously unanswered question of state law. 1 This is by no means the first time the federal court in Delaware has been called upon to make such a determination. 2 See, e.g., Walker v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 661 F.Supp. 930 (D.Del.1987); Ritter v. Amica Mut. Ins. Co., 633 F.Supp. 362 (D.Del.1986); O’Hanlon v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co., 439 F.Supp. 377 (D.Del.1977), modified, 639 F.2d 1019 (3d Cir.1981). The Court has…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Sondra L. McKenna and James R. McKenna v. Ortho Pharmaceutical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Pennsylvania Glass Sand Corporation v. Caterpillar Tractor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Frank v. Horizon Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1989
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. KennerSupreme Court of Delaware · 1990
- Monteith v. Jefferson Ins. Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of Vermont · 1992
- Krutz v. Harleysville Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1991
- Essick v. BarksdaleDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.