King v. California Bank
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.
Action brought to recover of defendant and appellant the sum of $452.78, claimed by plaintiff and respondent to have been deposited by her with the Home Savings Bank of Los Angeles, predecessor of appellant. Appellant admits a balance of $52.78 to be due respondent, leaving $400 as the actual amount in controversy. Plaintiff maintained' both a commercial and a savings account with the Home Savings Bank, and claims that her husband, W. A. King, on November 8, 1919, deposited to the credit of her savings account in said bank the sum of $400, and that on November 10, 1919, he deposited to her…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Newport Bay Dredging Co. v. HelmCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Fales v. New York Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Andrews v. ReidyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Iffland v. JohnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Groobman v. CallahanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932