Legal Opinion

State v. Lofton

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 3, 1979No. 798SC237PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAUGHN, Judge.

Prior to trial, defendant made a motion to suppress the evidence seized in a search of her apartment pursuant to a search warrant. Defendant claims that the warrant was invalid because there was no confidential informant as alleged in the affidavit and that the information contained in the affidavit resulted from an illegal search of defendant’s premises.

Officer Johnson testified on voir dire that about 7:00 p.m. on 27 June 1978, he met with a confidential informer who told him that he had been at defendant’s apartment a couple of days before and had seen about thirty marijuana…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. HarveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. State v. BaxterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  3. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  4. State v. BalsomCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
  5. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. RozierCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  2. State v. RoseboroCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  3. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API