State v. Balsom
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Judge.
Defendants, Balsom, Gove, Kausner and Siracuse, assign as error the denial of their motions for judgments as of nonsuit.
“An accused’s possession of narcotics may he actual or constructive. . . . Where such materials are found on. the premises under the control of an accused, this fact, in and of itself, gives rise to an inference of knowledge and possession which may be sufficient to carry the case to the jury on a charge of unlawful possession.” State v. Harvey, 281 N.C. 1, 12, 187 S.E. 2d 706, 714 (1972)
When the evidence in the present case is considered in the light most…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. HarveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Haley v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1969
- State v. KingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. JamesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- State v. LoftonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- State v. SlaughterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
- State v. GagneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.