Legal Opinion

State v. Williams

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 5, 1976No. 19PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRANCH, Justice.

Defendant assigns as error the trial judge’s failure to state the evidence and apply the law thereto as required by G.S. 1-180. He argues that the judge did nothing more than to state the contentions of the parties. The portion of the charge to which defendant excepts is as follows:

Now, ladies and gentlemen of the jury, the law imposes upon me the responsibility of reviewing the evidence sufficiently for you to understand my charge as to law. . . .

The State contends that some of the evidence favorable to the State is as follows: That on the 10th day of September, 1975, about…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Woodson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. State v. PeeleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. Brannon v. EllisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. State v. BestSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  5. State v. . ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. BowdenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. State v. BentonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Hendrix v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  4. Larry D. Calloway v. Frank Blackburn, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  5. State v. LoftonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API