Matlack v. Burlington Cy. Bd. of Chosen Freeholders
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
1Opinion of the Court
194 N.J. Super. 359 (1984)
476 A.2d 1262
MARVIN F. MATLACK, JOHN W. STORY AND JUNE G. STORY, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
BURLINGTON COUNTY BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, NEW JERSEY CONSERVATION FOUNDATION AND THE ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND, INC., DEFENDANT-INTERVENORS-RESPONDENTS, AND NEW JERSEY PINELANDS COMMISSION, AMICUS CURIAE.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued June 5, 1984.
Decided June 14, 1984.
Before Judges BOTTER, PRESSLER and O'BRIEN.
Sam Kazman of the District of Columbia bar, admitted pro hac vice, argued the cause for appellants (John W.…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Jersey City Chapter of Property Owner's Protective Ass'n v. City Council of Jersey CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
- AMN, Inc. v. Township of South Brunswick Rent Leveling BoardSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
- Property Owners Assn. of N. Bergen v. Tp. of N. BergenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
- Camarco v. City of OrangeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1972
- Dolan v. Borough of TenaflySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Interlake Porsche + Audi, Inc. v. BucholzCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
- Heyert v. TaddeseNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2013
- Loigman v. Township CommitteeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
- Pullen v. SO. PLAINFIELD PLAN. BD.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1995
- Somers Associates v. Gloucester Tp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.