Legal Opinion
Camarco v. City of Orange
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided October 10, 1972PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Per curiam
We affirm for the reasons expressed by the Appellate Division in Camarco v. City of Orange, 116 N. J. Super. 531 (1971).
In. July 1969, the plaintiff Philip Camarco, Jr., a resident of West Orange, was arrested by members of the Orange Police Department and was charged with loitering in a. local *465parking lot in violation of an ordinance of the City of Orange. While the charge against him was pending he instituted a declaratory judgment proceeding seeking to have the ordinance declared unconstitutional. See State v. Baird, 50 N. J. 376, 378-379 (1967); cf. Anderson v. Sills, 56 N. J. 210,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Coates v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Shuttlesworth v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- People v. DiazNew York Court of Appeals · 1958
3Cited by27 opinions
- Right to Choose v. ByrneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
- State v. EckerSupreme Court of Florida · 1975
- State, Tp. of Pennsauken v. SchadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
- State v. LashinskySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
- Waldron v. McAteeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.