Legal Opinion
Heyert v. Taddese
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided June 25, 2013PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
PARRILLO, P.J.A.D.
This appeal arises from a landlord-tenant dispute. The tenants, plaintiffs Brian Heyert, Jude Noel, Diana Weiner, Peter Schoepe, Jr., and Karl Mawhinney (collectively tenants), claimed that the landlords, defendants Menassie Taddese and Yayine Melaku, violated the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act (CFA), N.J.S.A. 56:8-1 to -195, by charging rent in excess of that allowed by local rent control ordinances, and that the municipality erred in granting the landlords a hardship rent increase. The landlords claimed that the municipality’s rent…
2Cases cited97 opinions
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Paul and Barbara Miller v. Bank of America Home Loan Servicing, L.P.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2015
- Bove v. Akpharma Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019
- Lisa R. Worthy v. Kennedy Health SystemNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2016
- JEFFREY S. JACOBS VS. MARK LINDSAY AND SON PLUMBING & HEATING, INC. (L-3120-14, ESSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019
- State of New Jersey v. Jean A. SeneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2015
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.