Legal Opinion
Pullen v. SO. PLAINFIELD PLAN. BD.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided January 24, 1995PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
291 N.J. Super. 303 (1995)
677 A.2d 278
HENRY PULLEN, PLAINTIFF,
v.
SOUTH PLAINFIELD PLANNING BOARD & HENRY FEINBERG, T/A RITE-AID PHARMACY, DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division Middlesex County.
Decided January 24, 1995.
James F. Clarkin, for Plaintiff, Henry Pullen (Borrus, Goldin, Foley, Vignuolo, Hyman and Stahl).
Renato R. Biribin, for Defendant, South Plainfield Planning Board.
Stephen L. Ritz and Marie Seitz, for Defendant, Henry Feinberg, T/A Rite-Aid Pharmacy (O'Brien, Liotta & Mandel).
WOLFSON, J.S.C.
This is an action in lieu of Prerogative Writs brought by Henry Pullen, an…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Kramer v. BD. OF ADJUST., SEA GIRT.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
- Jantausch v. Borough of VeronaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- Ward v. ScottSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- Jantausch v. Borough of VeronaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
- Burbridge v. Governing BodySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Independent Realty v. North BergenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
- CBS Outdoor v. Lebanon Plan. Bd.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2010
- Chicalese v. Monroe Tp. Plan. Bd.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000
- TWC REALTY v. Zoning Bd. of Adjust.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
- Verna v. Links at ValleybrookNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.