Legal Opinion · Dissent

Tocci v. . Nowfall

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 7, 1942PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1DissentStacy, C. J.

BARNHILL and WINBORNE, JJ., concur in dissent. The Industrial Realty Company, a North Carolina corporation, was granted a charter on 15 December, 1924, and amongst other things had power to engage generally in the real estate business. Some time thereafter in a deed filed for registration on 15 May, 1925, G. A. Marsh and wife conveyed to "Industrial Realty Company, a Corporation, as Trustee," a large number of lots, including the lot which is the subject of this controversy. Thehabendum clause and succeeding clause are as follows:

"TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the aforesaid lots of land, together with…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Blagge v. MilesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1841
  2. Greenway v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
  3. Bishop v. SchneiderSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870
  4. Eaton v. . DoubSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  5. Towles v. . FisherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Chavis v. GibbsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1956
  2. Chandler v. . CameronSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  3. Schaeffer v. . HaseltineSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  4. Johnson Cotton Company v. HobgoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  5. Jerome v. Great American Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API