Johnson Cotton Company v. Hobgood
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDbnNY, J.
This appeal presents for determination whether the indexing and cross-indexing of the chattel mortgage, in the manner set forth above, constituted a sufficient compliance with G.S. 161-22 to give notice of plaintiff’s lien on the tobacco crop in controversy.
It is now established law in this jurisdiction that the proper indexing and cross-indexing of instruments r.equired to be registered is an essential part of their registration. Dorman v. Goodman, 213 N.C. 406, 196 S.E. 352; Story v. Slade, 199 N.C. 596, 155 S.E. 256; Heaton v. Heaton, 196 N.C. 475, 146 S.E. 146; Whitehurst v. Garrett, 196…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Wynn v. GrantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Wynn v. . GrantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Dorman v. GoodmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Davis v. . WhitakerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
- Dorman v. . GoodmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Mickel-Hopkins, Inc. v. FrassinettiCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1960
- Cuthrell v. Camden CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- Stafford v. Admiral Credit Corp.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1968
- Manufacturing Co. v. . HesterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- Northern v. SunTrust Bank, N.A. (In Re McCormick)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.