Legal Opinion

Johnson Cotton Company v. Hobgood

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 14, 1955No. 533PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDbnNY, J.

This appeal presents for determination whether the indexing and cross-indexing of the chattel mortgage, in the manner set forth above, constituted a sufficient compliance with G.S. 161-22 to give notice of plaintiff’s lien on the tobacco crop in controversy.

It is now established law in this jurisdiction that the proper indexing and cross-indexing of instruments r.equired to be registered is an essential part of their registration. Dorman v. Goodman, 213 N.C. 406, 196 S.E. 352; Story v. Slade, 199 N.C. 596, 155 S.E. 256; Heaton v. Heaton, 196 N.C. 475, 146 S.E. 146; Whitehurst v. Garrett, 196…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Wynn v. GrantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  2. Wynn v. . GrantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  3. Dorman v. GoodmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  4. Davis v. . WhitakerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  5. Dorman v. . GoodmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Mickel-Hopkins, Inc. v. FrassinettiCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1960
  2. Cuthrell v. Camden CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  3. Stafford v. Admiral Credit Corp.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1968
  4. Manufacturing Co. v. . HesterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  5. Northern v. SunTrust Bank, N.A. (In Re McCormick)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API