Legal Opinion
Procter & Gamble Co. v. Nabisco Brands, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided April 2, 1987No. Civ. A. No. 84-333 LONPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LONGOBARDI, District Judge.
On June 19,1984, Plaintiff The Procter & Gamble Company (“P & G”) brought these actions alleging patent infringement, inducement of patent infringement and unfair competition.1 United States Letters Patent No. 4,455,333 (“the ’333 patent”) was issued to P & G on the same date and covers the invention styled “Doughs and Cookies Providing Storage-Stable Texture Variability.” The patent describes a method of manufacturing ready-to-serve cookies which remain crispy on the outside and chewy on the inside during an extended shelf-life. P & G markets its product…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Adams v. Gould Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Massarsky v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Gwendolyn Howze v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Seidel v. LeeDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1996
- Carib Ocean Shipping, Inc. v. ArmasDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Site Microsurgical Systems, Inc. v. the Cooper Companies, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1992
- McIntyre v. Division of Youth Rehabilitation Services, Department of Services for Children, Youth & Their FamiliesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1992
- Manchester v. RzewnickiDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.