Legal Opinion
Site Microsurgical Systems, Inc. v. the Cooper Companies, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided June 9, 1992No. Civ.A. 90-660-JLLPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
LATCHUM, Senior District Judge.
The plaintiff, Site Microsurgical Systems, Inc. (“Site”), filed suit against the defendant, The Cooper Companies, Inc. (“Coo per”) alleging patent infringement. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion to join its parent corporation, the Iolab Corporation (“Iolab”), as a party plaintiff under Rule 15. (Docket Item [“D.I.”] 69; 70.) Site contends that the alleged infringement of its patent “also deprived Iolab of sales of collateral products which are dependent on the sales of Site’s [patented] products.” (D.I. 69 1114.)
The defendant opposes the…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Allan J. Jablonski v. Pan American World Airways, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Mercoid Corp. v. Mid-Continent Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Lans v. GATEWAY 2000, INC.District Court, District of Columbia · 1999
- Morris v. Paul Revere Insurance GroupDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1997
- CVI/Beta Ventures, Inc. v. TURA LPDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1995
- Pipe Liners, Inc. v. American Pipe & Plastics, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1995
- Agere Systems Guardian Corp. v. Proxim, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.