Legal Opinion
Manchester v. Rzewnicki
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided October 30, 1991No. Civ. A. 91-93-JLLPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
LATCHUM, Senior District Judge.
The plaintiff, a prisoner at the Delaware Correctional Center, has filed suit pro se against various Delaware State officials. The defendants have moved for dismissal of this action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). In spite of the reams of documentation submitted and the liberal reading of this complaint in the plaintiff’s favor, this Court has determined that the motion to dismiss must be granted. For the reasons set forth below, the plaintiff fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Accordingly, the complaint…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Manchester v. Drug Enforcement Admin., U.S. Dep't of JusticeDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
- Lewis v. State of Del. Dept. of Public InstructionDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1996
- Bonds v. Berne Union Local SchoolsDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2022
- Canada v. AntonyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2021
- Charles “Randy” Rich v. Witt O’Brien’s USVI, LLC, Levated Careers, Inc. and Prime Universal Group, LLCDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2026
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.