Legal Opinion
Union Pacific Railroad v. Reilly Industries, Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided February 9, 1998No. CIV. 4-95-960 DSD JMMPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DOTY, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on the cross motions of plaintiff and defendant for summary judgment on plaintiffs state law claims. Based on a review of the file, record and proceedings herein, and for the reasons stated, the court denies the cross motions for summary judgment.
BACKGROUND
This case involves a dispute between plaintiff Union Pacific Railroad Company (“Union Pacific”) and defendant Reilly Industries, Inc. (“Reilly”). Union Pacific seeks injunc-tive and compensatory relief for past and future costs to clean up contamination resulting from the former…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Northern States Power Co. v. FranklinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- Dalton v. Dow Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bluebeard's Castle, Inc. v. HodgeDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2009
- State Ex Rel. Hatch v. Employers Insurance of WausauCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
- Sewell v. Phillips Petroleum Co.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 2002
- Minnesota Ex Rel. Northern Pacific Center, Inc. v. BNSF Railway Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2010
- Montana v. Atlantic Richfield Co.District Court, D. Montana · 2003