Legal Opinion
Sewell v. Phillips Petroleum Co.
District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Decided April 12, 2002No. 01-1062PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BARNES, District Judge.
Now, on this 12th day of April, 2002, COMES ON FOR CONSIDERATION two motions in the above captioned matter: a Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. 56) by separate Defendant, Texaco Inc. (“Texaco”), and a Motion for Renewal of Texaco Inc.’s Statement of Undisputed Facts, Motion for Summary Judgment and Brief in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment (“Renewal Motion”)(doc. 66). The Court has reviewed these Motions along with the Sewells’ Response (doc. 70), Texaco’s Reply (doc. 74), and all other supporting documentation. The Court, being well and…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Donna Krenik v. County of Le SueurCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Patton v. TPI Petroleum, Inc.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2005
- Highland Industrial Park, Inc. v. BEI Defense Systems Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- Highland Industrial Park, Inc. v. Bei Defense Systems CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- Highland Industrial v. BEI Defense SystemsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004