Burnand v. Irigoyen
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtDoran, J.
This is an action in unlawful detainer. The litigation arose out of an agreement entered into between the appellant and Juan J. Irigoyen, Marie Antoinette Irigoyen, and Ana Maria Rankow, as guardian of the persons and. the estates of Juan J. Irigoyen and Marie Antoinette Irigoyen, relating to a large and expensive residence in the Hollywood Hills, Los Angeles, and its furnishings.
Immediately after entering into the agreement the defendants defaulted in their payments and after waiting until June, 1940, appellant filed action No. 453030 in the Superior Court for Los Angeles County, entitled…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Agar v. WinslowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Nevills v. ShortridgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Scheeline v. MoshierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Martin v. SplivaloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Kirsch v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lord v. GarlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Burnand v. IrigoyenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Ostrowski v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- V & P Trading Co. v. United Charter, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Rossdale Grp., LLC v. Walton, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.