Nevills v. Shortridge
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
COOPER, C.
Appeal by defendants from judgment on the judgment-roll without a bill of exceptions. The action was brought to recover a balance alleged to be due upon two promissory notes, one for twenty thousand dollars and one for forty thousand dollars, both dated November 30, 1896, and to foreclose a mortgage given to secure the said notes. The action was commenced November 30, 1898. The answers alleged, and the court found, that the action was prematurely commenced by reason of an agreement made by plaintiff on April 30, 1898, extending the time for the payment of said notes for one year…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Moore v. SargentIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Pitts Sons' Manufacturing Co. v. Commercial National BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
3Cited by21 opinions
- Colvig v. RKO General, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1965
- Kelley v. UpshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- CENTER FOR SELF-IMPROVEMENT & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT v. Lennar Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- Williams v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Ostrowski v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.