Martin v. Splivalo
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Clara County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Belcher, C. C.
This is an action of ejectment for the possession of certain real property in Santa Clara County.
The plaintiff claims title to the demanded premises , under a deed executed to him by the defendants on the fourteenth day of July, 1877. The deed purports to have been made in consideration of five dollars, the receipt of which is acknowledged, “ and the assumption by the party of the second part of the indebtedness hereinafter recited.” The recital referred to is as follows: “Sard premises are subject to a deed of trust executed by the parties of the first part to James de Fremery,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hicks v. LovellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- Comstock v. . DrohanNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- American Co. v. BradfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- Bowen v. . BeckNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Slauson v. . WatkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Brison v. BrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Ex parte ChristensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Scheeline v. MoshierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Conner v. Bank of BakersfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Ex Parte SweetmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.