Erickson v. Starling
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Stagy, O. J.
While the complaint in this action contains 80 separate allegations and covers 22 pages of the record, in its final analysis the case comes to a very narrow compass. Is there a misjoinder of parties and causes of action? The trial court thought not, and we approve.
It is readily conceded that a misjoinder of parties and causes of action in the same complaint is demurrable, and the court is without authority, in such case, to order a severance of the causes of action for trial under the provisions of G.S. 1-132. Teague v. Oil Co., 232 N.C. 65, 59 S.E. 2d 2; Rose v. Warehouse Co.,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Rossi v. DavisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
- Leach v. . PageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. PiersonNew York Supreme Court · 1927
- Daniels v. . FowlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
- Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co. v. FloydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- ARCADY FARMS MILLING COMPANY v. WallaceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Edgecombe Bank & Trust Co. v. BarrettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Pilot Title Insurance Co. v. Northwestern BankCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
- Miller v. McLeanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Paccar Financial Corp. v. Harnett Transfer, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.