Legal Opinion

Rossi v. Davis

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided November 22, 1939PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The action out of which the six above entitled appeals grew was instituted in the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis by Victor D. Rossi and Mae R. Haseman, plaintiffs, trustees of Simon D. Rossi (now deceased), under a trust instrument executed by the latter. Plaintiffs are children of said Simon D. Rossi and are the trustees named by him in said trust instrument. They accepted the trust, qualified and are so acting. The defendants are the other children of said Simon D. Rossi and a grandson, son of a deceased daughter, named beneficiaries, and other grandchildren, potential beneficiaries…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Smithsonian Institution v. MeechSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Corcoran v. Chesapeake and Ohio Canal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Womach v. City of St. JosephSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  4. Moran v. MoranSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  5. Duffill v. Los Angeles Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Commerce Trust Company v. WeedSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  2. Barkley v. Carter County State BankMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Prentzler Ex Rel. Frazee v. SchneiderSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
  4. Sebree v. RosenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1961
  5. Holt v. HoltSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API