Paccar Financial Corp. v. Harnett Transfer, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WHICHARD, Judge.
The sole contention presented by defendant Hard Times is that the trial court erred in granting plaintiff’s motion pursuant to G.S. 1A-1, Rule 50(b), for judgment in accordance with its motion for a directed verdict on plaintiffs right to immediate possession of the truck. Rule 50(b), in pertinent part, provides:
Whenever a motion for directed verdict made at the close of all the evidence is denied or for any reason is not granted, the submission of the action to the jury shall be deemed to be subject to a later determination of the legal questions raised by the motion. ...…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cutts v. CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Hunt v. Montgomery Ward and Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- In Re Will of PendergrassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- McMillan v. Gen. American Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
- Erickson v. StarlingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United Laboratories, Inc. v. KuykendallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- Boyd v. WattsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- Smith v. Carolina Coach Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
- J. W. Cross Industries, Inc. v. Warner Hardware Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
- Boyd v. WattsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.