Legal Opinion

Edgecombe Bank & Trust Co. v. Barrett

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 25, 1953No. 107PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

It is a well-established general principle of equity that property impressed with a trust may be followed through all changes in its state and form, so long as such property or its proceeds or its products are capable of identification. Edwards v. Culberson, 111 N.C. 342, 16 S.E. 233; Erickson v. Starling, 233 N.C. 539, 64 S.E. 2d 832; 54 Am. Jur., Trusts, Sec. 248; 65 C.J., p. 967 et seq.

Mr. Pomeroy amplifies tbe rule this way: “In general, whenever the legal title to property, real or personal, has been obtained through actual fraud, ... or under any other similar circumstances, which…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Gibbons v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Holmes v. . GilmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  3. Corp. Commission v. Merchants Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  4. Edwards v. . CulbersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
  5. Coley v. . DalrympleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Variety Wholesalers, Inc. v. Salem Logistics Traffic Services, LLCSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2012
  2. Fulp v. FulpSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. Greer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1971
  4. Bowling v. BowlingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  5. Michigan National Bank v. Flowers Mobile Homes Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API