Pilot Title Insurance Co. v. Northwestern Bank
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
GRAHAM, Judge.
Appellants contend plaintiff does not have standing to seek injunctive relief, urging the well established principle that injunctive relief will be granted only where there is not a full, adequate and complete remedy at law. In re Davis, 248 N.C. 423, 103 S.E. 2d 503; Cotton Mills Co. v. Duplan Corp., 245 N.C. 496, 96 S.E. 2d 267.
Appellants’ position is that plaintiff has an adequate remedy at law in that it could assert any matters asserted here as a defense to an action brought by defendant to recover under the policy. Whether this obviously available legal remedy would be so…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Lowendahl v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- Lowendahl v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- BW Acceptance Corporation v. SpencerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Henderson v. SECURITY MORTAGAGE AND FINANCE CO.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Ferrell v. Department of TransportationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
- J. M. Thompson Co. v. Doral Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Allen v. FerreraCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Old Southern Life Insurance v. Bank of North Carolina, N.A.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- Mayes v. MooreDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.