Legal Opinion
Harris, Carla v. Gonzales, Alberto
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided May 25, 2007No. 05-5494PublishedCited by 91 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TATEL, Circuit Judge.
Appellant, an independent contractor working for the Department of Justice, contacted an equal employment opportunity counselor to file a sex discrimination complaint against the Department, but she failed to do so until after the 45-day time limit for federal employees to make such contacts had expired. The applicable regulation requires an extension of the 45-day period if the complainant “was not notified of the time limits.” 29 C.F.R. § 1614.105(a)(2). Concluding that appellant should have known about the 45-day requirement from posted notices, the distinct court…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Czekalski, Loni v. Peters, MaryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
- Smith-Haynie, J. C. v. Davis, AddisonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- William L. Mondy v. Secretary of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
- Sizova v. National Institute of Standards & TechnologyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Teemac v. HendersonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by91 opinions
- Greer v. PaulsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
- Winston v. CloughDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Vasser v. ShinsekiDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Glass v. LaHoodDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Murphy v. Executive Office for United States AttorneysCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.