Legal Opinion
Murphy v. Executive Office for United States Attorneys
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided June 16, 2015No. 14-5044PublishedCited by 74 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge HENDERSON.
KAREN LECRAFT HENDERSON, Circuit Judge:
James Murphy is a federal prisoner. He submitted a request under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. § 552, to the Executive Office for United States Attorneys (EOUSA), a part of the United States Department of Justice. See Harris v. Gonzales, 488 F.3d 442, 443 (D.C.Cir.2007). FOIA requires federal agencies to produce “records” upon request unless one of nine statutory exemptions applies. 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(3)(A). Murphy sought grand jury information for two criminal cases. The EOUSA gave…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- United States Department of Justice v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Larson v. Department of StateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- American Civil Liberties Union v. United States Department of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
- John Doe Agency v. John Doe Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- Hardy v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and ExplosivesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Poitras v. Dep't of Homeland Sec.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Daily Caller v. U.S. Department of StateDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- James Madison Project v. Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Looks Filmproduktionen Gmbh v. Central Intelligence AgencyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.