Legal Opinion

Robert W. L. Rasin & Co. v. Conley

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 2, 1882PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County. The case is stated in the opinion of the Court. • First Exception.—At the trial the defendant’s counsel asked a witness (the defendant,) the following question: “ Did you use any other fertilizer, or Bond’s Fertilizer on the same field, and. what was the difference in the wheat between that portion of the field where you used Bond’s Fertilizer, and that portion of the field where you used the Raisin Fertilizer?” To…

Read the full summary

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County. The case is stated in the opinion of the Court. • First Exception.—At the trial the defendant’s counsel asked a witness (the defendant,) the following question: “ Did you use any other fertilizer, or Bond’s Fertilizer on the same field, and. what was the difference in the wheat between that portion of the field where you used Bond’s Fertilizer, and that portion of the field where you used the Raisin Fertilizer?” To which question -the plaintiffs objected, but the majority of the Court, (Brent and Ma&rüder, J.) overruled the objection…

1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.

In this case suit was brought by the appellants against the appellee upon the following note : .

“Montgomery Co., Md., Sept. 16th, 18l76.
“Messrs. R. W. L. Rasin & Co.:
“Will please forward me thirty bags, of Soluble Sea Island Guano, say 6000 pounds, for which I promise to pay *63you one hundred and thirty-eight dollars on or before the 16th day of September 18*71; Payable at Rational Bank of the Republic, Washington, JL). 0.
“$138.00. C. W. Conley.”

At the trial two exceptions were taken, one as to the admissibility of certain testimony offered by the defendant, and the other to the rulings of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Whelan v. CookCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1868
  2. Rice v. ForsythCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1875
  3. Walker v. PueCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1881

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hampton Guano Co. v. Hill Live-Stock Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  2. Bancroft v. San Francisco Tool Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Reese & Co. v. BatesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1897
  4. Luria Bros. & Co. v. KlaffCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1921
  5. Warren Glass Works Co. v. Keystone Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1886

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API