Legal Opinion

Doe v. Prosecutor, Marion County, Ind.

District Court, S.D. Indiana

Decided June 24, 2008No. 2:08-cv-00436PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

DAVID F. HAMILTON, Chief Judge.

In 2008 the Indiana General Assembly enacted Public Law 119, which amended many of the requirements imposed upon those persons who must register with the state as sex offenders and violent offenders. This case presents a challenge to one of the new requirements as it would apply to those who have completed their sentences and are no longer on parole, probation, or any other form of court supervision. Under the new statute, set to take effect on July 1, 2008, all those who must register must also consent to the search of…

2Cases cited88 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. GradySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2019
  2. Doe v. NebraskaDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2010
  3. Greer v. BussIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. Little Arm Inc. v. AdamsDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2014
  5. Ostergren v. McDonnellDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API