Legal Opinion
Little Arm Inc. v. Adams
District Court, S.D. Indiana
Decided March 31, 2014No. 1:13-cv-00862-RLY-DMLPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ENTRY ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS
RICHARD L. YOUNG, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs, Little Arm Inc. d/b/a B & B Distributions (“Little Arm”), Bohemian Groove LLC (“Bohemian”), MELX2 Enterprises Inc. (“MELX2”), and IDK Anything LLC (“IDK”), bring this action against all Prosecuting Attorneys in Indiana (“Defendants”) seeking injunctive and declaratory relief as to Indiana Code 35-48-4-10.5, which makes it illegal to possess, distribute, or manufacture any “synthetic drug lookalike substance,” as defined in Indiana Code § 35-31.5-2-321.5. Plaintiffs allege that the Statute…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Legato Vapors LLC v. CookDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2016
- Little Arm Inc. v. AdamsDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2014
- Powell v. Town of GeorgetownDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2016
- Whole Woman's Health Alliance v. HillDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2019
- Amor v. CrossDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2024
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.