Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Rivers

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 1, 2004No. 25788PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice MOORE:

We granted certiorari to review the Court of Appeals’ decision 1 affirming the trial court’s exclusion of petitioner’s expert on biomechanics. We reverse.

ISSUE

Did the Court of Appeals err by affirming the trial court’s exclusion of the videotaped deposition of petitioner’s biome-chanics expert?

FACTS

Respondent was a passenger in a car stopped at a red light. A car driven by petitioner struck respondent’s car from behind. At the time of impact, respondent, who was sitting in the front passenger seat, was wearing his seat belt and was leaning forward to retrieve his keys from the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Claude I. Smelser v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Norfolk and Western Railway Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  2. State v. CouncilSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  3. Lee v. SuessSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  4. Dorsett v. American Isuzu Motors, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Mizell v. GloverSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Watson v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  2. Austin v. Stokes-Craven Holding Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  3. Maybank v. BB&T Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2016
  4. Gadson v. Mikasa Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006
  5. State v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API