Legal Opinion
Mizell v. Glover
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided September 3, 2002No. 25527PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHIEF JUSTICE TOAL:
Judy and John Mizell (“Mizells”) appeal the Court of Appeals’ decision affirming the jury’s verdict for the defendants, Dr. Alfred L. Glover and Alpine Podiatry Clinic (collectively referred to as “Dr. Glover”), in this medical malpractice suit. Mizell v. Glover, 339 S.C. 567, 529 S.E.2d 301 (Ct.App.2000).
Factual/Procedural Background
On March 2, 1993, Mrs. Mizell visited Dr. Glover for the first time for pain resulting from corns on the fourth and fifth toes of her right foot. The pain began after she started a new job requiring her to stand for long periods of time. On…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. Marvin P. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
- Wilder Corp. v. WilkeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
- United States v. TerryCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Noah Ryan Robinson and John Anthony Robinson, and Noah Robinson v. United States of America, and John A. Robinson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Gooding v. St. Francis Xavier HospitalSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Ellis v. DavidsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
- State v. PriceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
- Burroughs v. WorshamCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
- Durham v. VinsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
- State v. MyersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.