Legal Opinion

Boles v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1958PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBroadfoot, J.

Except for the motion made by claimant’s attorney this would be an ordinary workmen’s compensation case. The sole question to be determined was the extent of the permanent partial disability of the claimant. This question was to be resolved from the medical evidence in the record.

On the one hand there was the detailed written report of the surgeon who treated the claimant and made the skin grafts, which was supported by his testimony at the hearing. Opposed to that was a short written report by Dr. Haskins, who was not called as a witness.

Based solely upon the record, a question of fact was…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hannon v. MaddenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  2. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Georgiades v. GlickmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Miller & Lux Inc. v. RichardsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Bohn v. Sauk CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. City of KenoshaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Borello v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Opinion No. Oag 41-81, (1981), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1981
  4. Opinion No. Oag 7-78, (1978), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API