Borello v. Industrial Commission
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.
It is the appellant’s contention that the commission does not lack jurisdiction to reconsider her claim because extrinsic fraud on the part of the employer, Marathon, prevented the commission from determining the real issue, namely, did the claimant suffer an occupational disease (lead poisoning) caused by her employment.
Counsel for the appellant candidly states in his brief:
“At the beginning of this argument it must be said that the following statement found near the end of Judge Bard-well’s ‘Directions for Judgment” is'a verity:
“ ‘There is not even a scintilla of evidence in this record…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Boring v. OttWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
- Thomas v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
- Pellett v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
- Union Free High School District of Village of Montfort v. Union Free High School District of Village of CobbWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
- Atkinson v. AtkinsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Moran v. Quality Aluminum Casting Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Zimmerman v. Wisconsin Electric Power Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- Mednis v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Ennis v. EnnisCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1979
- Crucible Steel Casting Co. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.