Legal Opinion

Bohn v. Sauk County

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1954PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, J.

As appears from the foregoing statement of facts, plaintiff’s claim for additional salary consists of two parts, to wit: (1) $2,550 for services rendered pursuant to the special act of the legislature enacted in 1929, which conferred limited civil and criminal jurisdiction upon the county court of Sauk county; and, (2) $138 for services rendered as juvenile judge from January 1, 1950, to February 22, 1950.

We will first consider the item1 of $2,550 of plaintiff’s claim by which he seeks to recover for three years’ services rendered pursuant to the. special act of 1929 conferring civil and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Green Bay Drop Forge Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  2. State Ex Rel. Larson v. GiesselWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Maus v. BlossWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Wasilewski v. Board of School Directors of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Georgiades v. GlickmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Ferguson v. City of KenoshaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Outagamie County v. Town of BrooklynWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  5. State Ex Rel. Hippler v. City of BarabooWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API