Ferguson v. City of Kenosha
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCuRRiE, J.
The principal issues on this appeal are:(1) Is the appeal procedure provided in the condemnation statutes the plaintiffs’ exclusive remedy to raise the issues attempted to be stated in plaintiffs’ complaint?(2) Does sec. 3a, art. XI, Const., bar the acquisition of lands by the state, or any agency or political subdivision thereof, for airport purposes through the exercise of the power of eminent domain?(3) In any event, was a jury determination of necessity required by sec. 2, art. XI, Const., as a condition precedent to the defendant commission entering the condemnation awards as to…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Thomson v. GiesselWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
- Vicksburg Waterworks Co. v. VicksburgSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- State ex rel. Bare v. SchinzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
- Klump v. CybulskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
- Lackaff v. BogueNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- County of Columbia v. BylewskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Jacobs v. MajorWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
- Falkner v. Northern States Power Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Pure Milk Products Cooperative v. National Farmers OrganizationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- Quinn v. Town of DodgevilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.