Legal Opinion

Wheelock v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided December 21, 1988No. 86-1102, 86-1191PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROGERS, Chief Judge:

In Shiel v. United States, 515 A.2d 405 (D.C.1986), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 1477, 99 L.Ed.2d 706 (1988), the court held that the government had properly invoked a regulation authorizing the early closing of the Capitol Rotunda for the purpose of conducting a security sweep of the Capitol before the President’s State of the Union Address to Congress later that evening. The court viewed the early closing order as a reasonable restriction on the time, place and manner of First Amendment expression because the government had met its burden of showing that security in…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Perry Education Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Cohen v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. United States v. GraceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Edwards v. South CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Hasty v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Markowitz v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Lederman v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2001
  4. Boertje v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Berg v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API