Legal Opinion
Hasty v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided December 18, 1995No. 87-CM-1230PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WAGNER, Chief Judge:
Appellant, Michael L. Hasty, was charged with one count of demonstrating in the United States Capitol Building (the Capitol) in violation of D.C.Code § 9-112(b)(7) (1989), and one count of unlawful entry of the Capitol in violation of D.C.Code § 22-3102 (1989). The charges arose out of a demonstration in the Rotunda of the Capitol. Following a jury trial, Hasty and a co-defendant, Donald Rem-mey, were found guilty on each count. On appeal, Hasty’s principal argument is that the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury on the “tourist standard,” i.e., that in order…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. GaudinSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Osborne v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Wilson-Bey v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- Russell v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- Williams v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
- Smith v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- Coates v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.