Legal Opinion

Boertje v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided October 31, 1989No. 85-1408PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TERRY, Associate Judge:

Appellant was convicted of unlawful entry 1 for having refused to leave the White House grounds when directed to do so by a person in lawful authority. On appeal he argues that he was engaging in symbolic speech at the White House and that the government failed to prove an additional specific factor establishing his lack of a legal right to remain there. He also contends that the trial court denied him the right to make an opening statement and to present an effective defense, and that the court erred in refusing to ask certain questions of the venire during the voir…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Clark v. Community for Creative Non-ViolenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Texas v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Darab v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Lyons v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Tate v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Gibson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Lyons v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API