Legal Opinion
Blanchard v. City of Ralston
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided February 7, 1997No. S-94-1142PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.
Marsha J. Blanchard, individually and as personal representative of the estate of Mary A. Reardon, commenced this inverse condemnation action against the City of Ralston. The Douglas County District Court denied Blanchard’s claim for damages. The Nebraska Court of Appeals reversed the judgment of the district court and remanded the cause for a determination of damages. See Blanchard v. City of Ralston, 4 Neb. App. 692, 549 N.W.2d 652 (1996). We granted the City’s petition for further review.
SCOPE OF REVIEW
In an appellate review of a bench trial in a law action, the trial court’s factual…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Howard v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
- Hill v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
- Lee Sapp Leasing, Inc. v. Catholic Archbishop of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
- Hancock v. City Council of DavenportSupreme Court of Iowa · 1986
- Blanchard v. City of RalstonNebraska Court of Appeals · 1996
3Cited by16 opinions
- Bauers v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
- Huffman v. PooreNebraska Court of Appeals · 1997
- Reuven Weizberg, David Peter Veng-Pedersen, Jacob Patrick Dagel v. City of Des Moines, Iowa, and Gatso USA, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2018
- Prokop v. Lower Loup Natural Res. Dist.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2019
- Kindred v. City of Omaha Employees' Retirement SystemNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.